At the recent Vision session dedicated to the topic of advocacy
the group was provided with multiple avenues to advocate for the profession at
the local, state and national levels. The
conversation was enlightening to the lobbying efforts of ArchiPAC, and clearly
laid out the goals and agenda for the upcoming year. The red button topics at the state level were
identified and the AIA Cincinnati advocacy group introduced itself. All certainly eye opening and noted.
Still, I believe the strongest venue for advocacy for the
profession is as citizen architect, grounded in the local issues through community
groups, school boards and local and city planning groups. What better way to
advertise the architect as problem solver, as ethical, as a facilitator, with
the ability to think outside the box and to the see the big picture. (Note: Andrew
Goldberg highlighted these qualities as the architects’ strengths as recognized
by the broader public).
Unfortunately, it seems that the academic education of the
architect is heavily dedicated to theory over practice and to designing unconceivable
high rises rather than community centers (at least these were the trends in my
school days). While this offers a
military like training in remolding the mind of the architect to think
critically I believe it is important for students to dig themselves out of the
studio, on occasion. Lead by the success
and publicity of the Rural Studio many architecture schools have added programs
that address local and community issues. So I do think that academia has evolved.
Anyways, local involvement and activity outside the office
in my mind plays the strongest advocate for the profession. This involvement promotes the strengths of
the architect to the community and legitimizes the necessity of the profession.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.