Thankfully most architecture does not happen in a vacuum. For centuries, architects have engaged in research to enhance their own understanding of buildings and the materials used to create them. But this "research" can take many forms. Often this architectural research is limited to gaining very project-focused knowledge. This could range from checking out a new building technique to analyzing architectural precedents to the often dreaded "code research". While this type of research is extremely necessary in day to day practice, it misses the intent of larger, further reaching research that can be conducted and applied not just to one project, but to the manner in which entire firms practice architecture or universities prepare future architects. So, why don't architects regularly engage in more scientific or theoretical research? Is that the role of the university? Is the time and money required by this type of research too great? This is a tentative time for architects and the future of our industry and practices. How can we afford not to make this investment in advancing our field?

Social Responsibility

Topic: “The role of authentic corporate value systems in attracting talent, raising the value of the Architect in building viable communities and the link between long term profitability and leadership.”

Public perception is that corporations are logos not people:

Research, Practice, & Beyond

For the most recent presentation for the Vision class we were asked to consider the connection between research and architectural practice.  In researching for this presentation I came across the AIA Upjohn Research Initiative.  This program is currently calling for submissions for 2013, basically your research has to qualify under one of the (6) offered categories that include Social, Environmental, Cultural, Organizational, Educational, & Technological topics.  The AIA awards up to four grants between $15,000 - $30,000, and the grants much be hard-dollar matched.  More info on the program can be found here:  http://www.aia.org/practicing/research/

 

In my presentation I tried to take an 'aspirational' approach to invigorate some thinking into the potential future of Architectural design that examined some case study projects including MVRDV's VRPO building, Sou Fujimoto's NA House, and Reiser + Umemoto's Vector Wall.  The presentation also looked at some scientific advancements currently happening that when applied to architecture holds some amazing opportunities.  These topics included Smart Thermobimetal self ventilating skin, Piezoelectrics, and Adaptive Systems such as Thigmo Morphogenesis. 

 

Automotive technology always seems to be one step ahead of Architectural technology.  One project I did not present yet holds some promise of future technology for Architecture is the BMW 'GINA' concept.  GINA being an acronym for "Geometry and functions in 'N' Adaptations".  The concept involves a fabric skinned car that allows it to shapeshift and adapt to driving conditions.   Check out this very awesome short video that shows the concept in action: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kTYiEkQYhWY

 

~Chris